WD1001FALS VS HD Tune AAM (128/254) - 儲存設備

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-03-16T11:26
at 2010-03-16T11:26
Table of Contents
爬了一下版上的AAM相關文,不過在數據上的討論並不多,
所以自己把玩了一下手上的 WD1001FALS,結果如下方圖:
AAM128:
http://i.imagehost.org/view/0862/HDTune_WDC_WD1001FALS-00U9B0_AAM128
AAM254:
http://i.imagehost.org/view/0229/HDTune_WDC_WD1001FALS-00U9B0_AAM254
除了搜尋時間和CPU使用率上有所差異之外,其他數據幾乎沒有變動,
雖然說測試僅供參考,畢竟這顆映蝶姬,也只是存放無損音訊資料用,
其實還蠻好奇,若是丟去當牧場糧倉或是BT培養皿,差距近6ms時間,
不知道有無明顯影響,尤其是在快取值設定特別高時,真耐人尋味。
--
Tags:
儲存設備
All Comments

By Hedy
at 2010-03-21T02:19
at 2010-03-21T02:19

By Ula
at 2010-03-24T06:43
at 2010-03-24T06:43

By Steve
at 2010-03-25T15:48
at 2010-03-25T15:48
Related Posts
開機卡在能源之星!!

By Todd Johnson
at 2010-03-16T11:14
at 2010-03-16T11:14
win7下開啟ahci

By Liam
at 2010-03-16T10:45
at 2010-03-16T10:45
調整分區大小 與 ghost 的問題

By Linda
at 2010-03-16T08:59
at 2010-03-16T08:59
創見4G和8G隨身碟挑選

By Genevieve
at 2010-03-16T02:38
at 2010-03-16T02:38
新竹愛買imation 2.5吋500G 2499元

By Odelette
at 2010-03-16T02:29
at 2010-03-16T02:29